paraphrand

That must be extremely frustrating internally at MS.

I wonder how discovery would go.

“4chan asks Donald Trump for help”

What a weird world.

I’m just not use to seeing internet drama on a local news site.

Ah, yes, I do avoid being too conversational.

I find it difficult to not throw in a “please” though.

That’s interesting insight, thanks for sharing.

I don’t like how recording it and posting it is a get out of jail free card regarding the problems of vigilantism. But I can’t argue against the idea should it keep them honest, and they should be slapped down if they cross red lines.

It really feels like part of a cyperpunk future. Personal video channels following vigilantes staking the digital play pens for predators.

Nah, think of it this way:

We are not in that group. Someone passing by observed that group, found surprising things going on, and then they posted a story to tell our group all about it.

That’s not the only way to slice it, but, it’s the one I was working under with my original comment.

Just for discussions sake, where does vigilantism end, though?

If this guy wasn’t recording everything and making a youtube channel out of it, I’d be much less interested in asking that question.

I’m also of the opinion that the tv show COPs was misguided and shouldn’t have existed. None of my opinions here are excuses for predators. I just find packaging up and “selling” the effort to be an indication of conflicting motives. And that makes me inclined to see the companies point about vigilantes, laws about entrapment, or whatever. Etc.

Ok, see that makes a lot more sense than whatever the other guy who replied to me is going on about and accusing me of.

Thanks for the reply.

Ok buddy. This conversation is broken. You keep asserting that I think regulation is always good. Like I’m on the side of Trump and Nixon and back doors and banning vpns or whatever the fuck else. You invented that.

NBC Chicago. Weird.

Can you write up the logic chain that made you assume I think any particular law is good for society, let alone the one you focused on?

All I was commenting on was the idea that conservatives are the ones crying “we live in a society” and not progressives. I’ve always considered progressive ideas to be more in touch with “we live in a society!” Than conservatives who want to punish and suppress marginalized groups who are, in fact, part of society.

What the hell man?

“Fuck you I got mine” is not considering others and ignores that we live in a society. And that’s what these conservative leaders are all about.

Corporations having no responsibility for the environment and the communities they are part of is a conservative ideal. It does not support society.

I noted the environmental laws because they were exceptions, and look a bit surprising in retrospect. When one learns Nixon passed major environmental laws, they are often surprised.

Oh wait, are you here to say those environmental laws, things like the clean air act are just tools of control over the common man. Clean air and water is oppression?

I’ve never picked up on a personality from an LLM this strongly. I can’t tell if it’s active resistance or evidence I’m somewhere on the spectrum.

The people you are responding to don’t hang around here.

Back doors are never safe. Never a good idea. They are always eventually a security hole.

“It’s just numbers! How difficult can it be!”

“How many b’s are in the word Blueberry?”

Hmm, I’ve never seen someone directly link conservatism to the entire concept of society.

I didn’t know considering societal conditions was conservative. But I guess conservative leaders in the US did implement a lot of environmental protections. 🤔

Where does the line actually fall, do you think? I assume I’m over extending a bit here. Making assumptions about what you mean.

Nice

How clean is your garage? Do you have one? Just curious.

There can be multiple factors.

People with garages big enough for a nice car that also have it stuffed with things probally have money too. Right?