Who cares? Bambu is proprietary shit that betrayed the community. Nobody should use their products, ever.

Is this a Windows problem I’m too Linux to understand?

Seriously, everything on my computer – Firefox, Dolphin, Gwenview, GIMP, etc. – supports webp just fine.

If you’re going to downvote my objectively correct statement of fact, at least have the courtesy to answer this: if you think a “regular bed” on a 70s/80s/90s full-size pickup is 8’, just how long do you think a “long bed” is?

What? The “regular bed” in a full-size truck was always 6.5’, even back in the ‘90s and earlier. That is longer than the “regular bed” in a compact truck (let alone the vestigial bullshit they sell you today), but it’s not 8’.

Not my fault you don’t understand the difference between “thread” and “comment chain.” Who’s illiterate now?

Moreover, who the fuck do you think you are? You’re not entitled to expect people to read anything but direct replies. You’re just not that important.

I don’t know where you think you wrote that, but it wasn’t in this comment chain. Are you expecting me to go hunting through your user page or something? You are not fucking entitled to call me “illiterate” for responding to what you actually wrote here and not being clairvoyant!

If anything, you’re the one who’s [concern] trolling here, playing devil’s advocate for Google.

What’s being discussed here isn’t “safety rails,” though. Why are you lying?

Android already had “safety rails,” which is why installing from sources other than the Play Store was called “sideloading” and not just “loading.” What’s happening now is that Google is turning those barriers against the users and building a cage to imprison them instead.

People need to understand how fucking despicable and beyond the pale this shit actually is, yet you’re making excuses for it instead. What the fuck.

I didn’t make up a damn thing. You clearly and obviously hate property rights. That’s the only reason you could possibly justify trying to take them away from people. Just admit it.

Claiming that corporations – not governments, corporations, which is why your catalytic converter analogy was bullshit BTW – need to self-servingly restrict people in the name of “protecting” them is fucking dishonest and you know it.

Why do you hate property rights?

Because that’s what your argument actually boils down to: utter and complete contempt for users’ property rights. You’re advocating for subjugating them to corporations as technofeudal serfs.

You know this to be true.

The key thing to understand is that there’s a big fucking difference between a “repository” and an “app store.” One is designed for the convenience of users; the other is designed to exploit them.

painting the bare wooden walls white

Welp, they just lost my business (not that I’d been there in years before this anyway…).

Painting real wood (other than maybe pine or poplar) is like painting brick: just don’t do it!

an i5-7500 should be faster

4 cores worth of Kaby Lake is faster than 32 cores worth of Interlagos?

Nothin’ I’m running, that’s for sure!

It’s not really that there are services that require that much processing power for a single request; it’s that it’s designed to handle normal requests for hundreds or thousands of users at once.

I suppose that supporting 0.5TB of RAM means it could deal with quite a big LLM, but any sort of halfway-modern GPU would absolutely run circles around it in terms of tokens per second, on any model that fit in their VRAM.

My drives are 3.5" 💀

It has an HBA, 3 hard drives, and 3 SSDs. I was going to add a couple more hard drives (just to try to get some more use out of old ones I had lying around), but 0.5TB ones might not have enough capacity to be worth their power draw.

The fascists know the tactics are counterproductive (from the perspective of someone with honest goals), and that’s why they’re using them.

The joke is that XKCD #404 is a literal HTTP 404 error.

Like a VM virtual disk? Those are exclusive to each VM and can’t be shared, so if you want multiple VMs to access the same data then NFS would be needed.

But containers with bind mounts don’t have that limitation and multiple containers can access the same data (such as media).

Just to be clear, are you saying that when you’re using bind-mounted ZFS pools, it’s okay to write from two containers (or both the proxmox host and a container) at the same time?

Also, I think I managed to accomplish that for a VM by creating a Proxmox Directory pointing to a path in a zpool, adding it to the VM using virtiofs, and mounting it within the VM. I’m not sure if writes from both the VM and the host are safe in that case either, though.

deleted by creator