• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Their AI will be looking over all of the responses, not people. No important person at Google’s time will be wasted on this.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s why keywords are important. For instance I added the fact that if they continue in this course I will seek to de-Google my phones.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they’ll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            But that makes no sense - they’ll go to someone who is even more restrictive in side loading?

            Google won’t reverse this because there’s no alternative for the relatively few people this will affect. They already don’t use Google things, and Apple don’t accomodate them. They’ve got them by the balls and they know it, which is why it’s all just empty threats even from people in here.

            • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The ones that don’t sideload obviously won’t care. But the ones that do are going to have little incentive to stick around if that was the main selling point for them, and the devs for non Google play apps leave because they don’t want to hand over info to Google.

              At that point why not go to Apple if Android no longer delivers the type of sideloading experience they desire? Apple is more polished, has longer support, battery life, and better peripherals.

              And those types likely will push family to move to Apple too if they are jumping ship, since they might be the ones overseeing tech support for the family anyways.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                The type of people crying over this are not moving to iPhones lol. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. Google know it, which is why they know they can do this with no issue.

                • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  The people crying over this are the ones who care about sideloading. So if that aspect is gone then why stick with Android? It’s definitely not for Google play apps for me.

                  If you want to defend how Google is bigger and won’t be affected you are better off pointing out that sideloading population isn’t that big, and that most users don’t use it so would be fine with iPhone or Android.

                  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    Side loading isn’t going away, just “anonymous” side loading. I suspect it will end up being a non-issue anyway, as simply registering as a developer through their portal so you can have your app be side loaded isn’t a big deal unless your app is doing something nefarious.

                    I’m not “defending” anything, let alone Google. All I’m doing is being realistic. The tiny minority of people this will affect have no alternative, and this change is likely to make very little actual change to those people anyway.