• bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I understand the paper trail that this is creating.

    But it does come across as Google gatekeeping.

    For example, what if I want to build an app, and distribute it outside of app stores with zero involvement from Google? It appears that cannot be done because I’d need to identify with Google through the developer program.

    What happens if Google doesn’t like that I made a chat app that bypasses censorship in specific country, it gets removed from play store, so i publish it on my website. What if Google gets mad at this and flags my identification?

    Suddenly no one can install my app that has nothing to do with Google.

    To me, even if it seems like a benign change, I can see how it can be exploited by Google to push whatever agenda they want.

    If Google disappeared the day after this is rolled out, would I still be able to add a valid identifier to my apk without Google’s involvement?

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think it seems like a benign change at all, for those reasons.

      Well, for most of them. It IS a concern that every single piece of bootable code on the platform is traceable to a specific person worldwide, for sure. The last one shouldn’t be an issue. If Google disappeared you’d still be able to run unsigned code on Android, since on paper this will only apply to “Android certified” devices. Not being certified may remove Google services and the Play Store, but in your scenario those are gone anyway. And there isn’t a ton of clarity about whether ID certification will be automatic. I presume it will be, but we won’t know until we hear from devs in their early access program.

      But apps being persecuted or censored by governments? Sure. That’s a very real issue. And Google and Apple deciding what people can run in their devices single-handedly? That’s entierly unacceptable.