• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    my take on it is that it was a mistake to push end-to-end encryption on every chat. now the government wants to remove privacy for everyone, because some people are going to abuse it.

    it would have been a better approach to make privacy through encryption possible, but somewhat technical so non-techy people aren’t going to use it much.

    context: EU tries to implement “chat control” (again) which is basically removing user’s privacy on private chat messages by letting the government spy on it.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      my take on it is that it was a mistake to push end-to-end encryption on every chat. now the government wants to remove privacy for everyone, because some people are going to abuse it.

      I’m inclined to agree with this, even though I dislike it. I think encryption should be accessible to everybody, for any purpose, no questions asked. But, making it mainstream allowed certain powers to control the narrative. It’s much easier to shift public opinions on something that most people know about, as opposed to something that’s more niche. While everybody should have access to encryption, there is benefit to obscurity, as well.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      governments are trying to take away privacy from regular people so we never should have tried to give it to everybody

      Wtf??? That’s completely asinine.