• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, if your reaction to “website wants permission to push notifications to your device” isn’t some mix between mirth and revulsion, I don’t fundamentally understand you.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s like people who actually watch commercials. If you don’t skip/look away/mute/otherwise attempt to ignore commercials, there are massive differences between us. I even had an ex who thought targeted ads were a good thing, and he would voluntarily fill out the marketing questions that streaming services asked in lieu of commercial breaks. I just … I can’t imagine wanting that.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Why pay for the fucking service, only to be served ads? It’s cable TV all over again. I hate it so much.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I have no idea where to find it anymore, but I once got an advertisement for some industrial machine that I think used lasers or something, but more importantly it sounded incredibly fake but was actually real. It was beautiful and made no sense to show me but I love it.

  • tomiant@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Science discovers that a type of repetitive leg movement that propels the body in a sustained motion over a flat surface can have positive health impacts if done for only twenty minutes every day.”

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 days ago

    What really hit me that all this superfood shit was nonsense was when I watched a real nutritionist answer a question about “the best superfood” and they said “potatoes.”

    • Panini@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s true, potatoes are one of the few singular plants that can provide almost all of a person’s nutritional needs with barely any other supplement.

      • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        More protein per acre than soy.

        A factoid brought to you by the National Potato Council, who told me this once and I’ve never bothered to fact check it.

        Edit: It’s a lie! What other lies have lobbing groups told me???

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          I am going to consider this a success story, given that you were transparent about the provenance of this factoid, and you corrected yourself. Yay for learning!

            • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yes, I did delight in getting to accurately use the word “factoid”; it’s useful for working through the trauma of learning that “factoid” doesn’t just mean a neat tidbit of fun facts, but rather quite the opposite. And for a “learning is fun” kind of gal like me, misinformation masked as genuine learning is deeply unfun — that is, unless we make the factoid itself our new object of study.

              The system works!

                • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Yeah, the returns really become increasingly marginal the longer a comment chain goes on. ^(I think I’m committed to the bit though)

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          iirc its more calories/acre than… well lliterally anything else. Not sure about any specific nutrient though.

          • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Corn beats it out, and by some reckonings so does rice. Pumpkins too.

            There are a few more exotic plants like tigernut and duckweed that are supposed to be really high, but not many people eat those as a staple crop. Palm oil and sugar cane are supposed to be super high too, though you probably don’t want to be eating huge quantities of straight oil and sugar.

            Finally there are a few tropical trees like jackfruit and breadfruit that produce enormous quantities of calories once mature. They have a huge advantage from their large leaf crowns and root systems (that they don’t have to periodically regrow like annual plants) + the tropical weather allowing production for the entire year.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Cheap, can be made into a variety of dishes, easy to prepare, really a winner allround.

    • tomiant@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, but no. Yes it’s a “super food” in the sense that they are easy to grow and are nutritious and contain almost everything the body needs, but you’d have to eat like twenty kilos a day to survive on them solely.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Rather broccoli. Mulberry and flaxseed too. Who knew, our pre-agriculture ancestors ate the healtiest.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            Most likely also because of their food. Diabetes, gluten intolerance, food allergies, vitamin deficiency from eating way too much of the one thing that grew and didn’t die that harvest. Food related issues were all rampant, people just died of them.

            • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Uhm, i’m talking pre-agriculture. Hunter-gatherer style, lots of seeds, some roots and vegetables, berries fruits, sometimes meat or fish.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                You’re not gonna believe why child mortality was so high.

                Also, the (often) improper diets of pregnant ladies, especially among the poorer classes of society, that meant a lack of essential vitamins and minerals, put mothers too at great risk. To compound the issue, matters got out of hand during the periods when the annual Nile floods did not materialize. With the mother dead, the newborn faced an uphill task in surviving the odds. Feeding a motherless child was one of the greatest difficulties that the ancient Egyptians encountered. The milk of livestock – cows and goats – was the only substitute to natural mother’s milk. How many could afford it? This is where the aunts or other close family members of the baby stepped in to carry out this function and keep the baby well-fed.

                It was also the food.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Now I’m starting to think that maybe Ray Cronise’s “potato diet” aka “Nutritarian diet” might not be so insane after all.

      It certainly seemed to work for Penn Jillette and Kevin Smith. It’s extreme, but might work for certain people. I don’t know if I would have the discipline personally.

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Did you know that the real reason why carrots are orange is that they absorb electromagnetic radiation on particular wavelengths and reflect it at others?

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 days ago

    And that even though they could’ve bait-and-switched with a whole range of colors:

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Ah, interesting. I guess, you mean those at around 10 o’clock? I’ve had the more sort of violet ones at 2 o’clock before and they looked like this:

        Violet carrots which look somewhat like beetroot inside

        They colored my whole food blue, as if I had spilled some ink into there. 🙃

        • Corn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I could be misremembering, I haven’t had a garden in a year, I just remember feeling scammed when 1 of the colors was only on the outside.

          Really nice carrot btw, girthy 🤤

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 days ago

            Oh, I didn’t mean to put your comment into question. I did find pictures on the internet like these, so it seems to be a thing:

            Purple carrots have been around for longer than the orange variety, though, so it’d be a bit weird to create a variety which is only purple on the outside just for scam purposes. Like, you can likely get the seeds for actually purple carrots much more easily. 🙃

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            From what I understand, this is what carrots often looked like originally. It was later on that we selected for more orange carrots.

            Either way, they certainly don’t taste beetroot-y. I’ve heard them described as somewhat sweeter. I’ve had them only once so far, but would agree with that description in the sense that they have a more rounded taste. I think, I like their taste slightly more.
            Wikipedia also says that the orange carrots probably won out not for tasting better, but rather because they don’t discolor stews, which is a fair reason.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      There are very few newsworthy items I’d be happy to receive a notification for… and I expect I’d find out about those pretty quick from other people anyway

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Me to a group of people: “I’ll do anything for money. No behavior is too low.” wink wink They all laugh and never talk to me again.

    Clickbait authors: “I’ll do anything for clicks. No behavior is too low.” wink wink The internet: clicking furiously

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    The carrot has mystery. Flowers are essentially tarts. Prostitutes for the bees. There is you will agree special about a firm, young carrot.