Last I looked the vast majority of the people in USSR, including the Baltics, voted against the break up when the referendum was held. Meanwhile, the politics in Baltics today have been curated by the west to make them what they are. After the fall of USSR, the west poured huge amounts of money into these countries and achieved political capture there.
Last I looked the vast majority of the people in USSR, including the Baltics, voted against the break up when the referendum was held.
Maybe look a little bit harder. In the 1990s the Baltics each saw a majority vote for pro-independence parties. Each of the three states organised a referendum on independence, and all three voted in favour (by 77%, 78% and even 90+% in Lithuania).
The march 14th 1991 referendum you’re probably referring to was not held in the Baltics. Additionally, it is often framed as a vote against independence, but that’s not really what was on the ballot in the first place. The referendum was on the New Union Treaty, and was phrased as:
Do you consider necessary the preservation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics in which the rights and freedom of an individual of any ethnicity will be fully guaranteed?
Emphasis mine. Note that the alternative in this case was the USSR continuing as it existed before, meaning there was no vote on the dissolution of the union. The majority voted in the direction of more sovereignty for the constituent states, the closest thing to independence on the ballot.
Pro-Soviet groups in the Baltics did attempt to hold their own independence referendums, but none managed to reach a 50% turnout and they were boycotted by the Baltic Supreme councils.
You too could be knowledgeable in your beliefs if you spend the time to educate yourself. The barrier to learning has never been lower in human history.
Last I looked the vast majority of the people in USSR, including the Baltics, voted against the break up when the referendum was held. Meanwhile, the politics in Baltics today have been curated by the west to make them what they are. After the fall of USSR, the west poured huge amounts of money into these countries and achieved political capture there.
Maybe look a little bit harder. In the 1990s the Baltics each saw a majority vote for pro-independence parties. Each of the three states organised a referendum on independence, and all three voted in favour (by 77%, 78% and even 90+% in Lithuania).
The march 14th 1991 referendum you’re probably referring to was not held in the Baltics. Additionally, it is often framed as a vote against independence, but that’s not really what was on the ballot in the first place. The referendum was on the New Union Treaty, and was phrased as:
Emphasis mine. Note that the alternative in this case was the USSR continuing as it existed before, meaning there was no vote on the dissolution of the union. The majority voted in the direction of more sovereignty for the constituent states, the closest thing to independence on the ballot.
Pro-Soviet groups in the Baltics did attempt to hold their own independence referendums, but none managed to reach a 50% turnout and they were boycotted by the Baltic Supreme councils.
And here I thought that the baltic states always considered their being occupied and annexed by imperialistic USSR was illegal.
Anybody can go through your comment history and see what you refer to as “thinking” actually constitutes.
I hold different opinions then you but I’m not going to discount your thinking as wrong or less-than.
I actually enjoy having conversations with you because you seem knowledgeable in your beliefs.
You too could be knowledgeable in your beliefs if you spend the time to educate yourself. The barrier to learning has never been lower in human history.
I do spend time educating myself and I feel pretty knowledgeable in my own beliefs.