themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squareMysteriousSophon21@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoTechnical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
minus-squareEnd-Stage-Ligma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 days ago it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistency. Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoSo it’s the CEO they should replace.
Technical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.
So it’s the CEO they should replace.