• itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    These assholes are bringing this mentality to the infrastructure industry now. As little as it worked in software development I promise you it works even less in large scale construction. That’s why infrastructure engineers are required to be licensed, we tried this bs 200 years ago and shit literally went off the rails

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I call bullshit. If you’re competent enough, the process of breaking things might actually let you learn stuff. And if you have a controlled environment, breaking things shouldn’t be an issue.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Move fast, break things.

    Move slow, break things.

    Don’t move at all, break things.

    Maybe I’m just bad at CSS

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Controversial opinion: I think software moving fast isn’t a good thing.

    The more versions come out and the more focus there is on new features, the more half baked/abandoned the existing features become and there will be more vulnerabilities.

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I probably shouldn’t even be using youtube in the first place, but 5 min ago I found out youtube is now forcing videos with an AI translated voice. While at the same time not having an option to change the audio track or disable the feature.

      This feels like a good example of pushing features most people don’t want while not providing a normal way to disable it.

      Thank God I use revanced and can spoof the client as IOS TV, this gives you the option do disable that crap.

      Firefox (even mobile) has this addon “YT Anti Translate”

      It’s pretty bad you have to go this far just to watch a video with the actual voice it was released with…

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I changed the language back to the original and never had an interaction with the ai voice again

        Do you not have the original audio track on the sound settings?

        • bier@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Is this on the desktop chrome version, or the app? For me in the app there is no button or any way to change this. Same for the site in Firefox mobile. I was on my phone, so I don’t know about the desktop version.

          • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Firefox desktop.

            Just checked with the android version, and I get the original audio track there, with options for ai dubbing

  • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    My company says it wants to move fast and break things but they really just want you to move fast and get mad when things break 🫠

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      “Everybody knows you can have it done well, fast, or cheap. Pick two.”

      “No! All three! All the time! Zero drawbacks! All profits and benefits! I am a very good and visionary boss. Have some room temperature Little Caesar’s on the house and make me rich.”

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well it didn’t say it wants to “Move fast -> break things -> not get mad”, so I’d say it has already done the things it is saying it wants to, right?

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If we break things, we can’t move at all.

    We need functioning things in order to move.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s fine to do that if you’re pre-customer and you’re just dabbling with a new idea. Once you are ready to go public though you need to be stable and secure. The big problem is when people try to apply the same development philosophy between established software and pre-alpha software.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree. It heavily depends on the “things” you’re breaking

      If it’s prod, that’s bad

      If it’s your “fuck-around” branch, go for it

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Once you are ready to go public though you need to be stable and secure

      Is that really true though? If you have a product people actually want, they’ll use it regardless of bugs

      • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That won’t be true once your competition catches up to you and your bug-riddled product is pissing off customers, pushing them towards your competitors.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          How much do you tolerate before switching sides? Think about Windows vs Linux. People don’t switch.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think move fast and break things is more what you do before you get any real competition, or to get better than the competition in some areas by taking shortcuts in others.

          You stop doing this when you’re the big dog. Then you embrace the image of reliability and stability.